What do America’s founding principles mean?
What do America’s founding principles mean?
“That is, if Muslims don’t kill me for leaving Islam, which it requires them to do. That’s just one of the reasons I’ve been writing and drawing against Islam and its Jihad for a number of years now. But fortunately for us, Islam hasn’t been able to make every Muslim its slave, just as Nazism wasn’t able to turn every German into a Nazi. So there is Islam and there are Muslims. Muslims who take Islam seriously are at war with us and Muslims who don’t aren’t.
But that doesn’t mean we should consider these reluctant Muslims allies against Jihad. I’ve been around Muslims my entire life and most of them truly don’t care about Islam. The problem I have with many of these essentially non-Muslim Muslims, especially in the middle of this war being waged on us by their more consistent co-religionists, is that they give the enemy cover. They force us to play a game of Muslim Roulette since we can’t tell which Muslim is going to blow himself up until he does. And their indifference about the evil being committed in the name of their religion is a big reason why their reputation is where it is.
So while I understand that most Muslims are not at war with us, they’ve proven in their silence and inaction against jihad that they’re not on our side either, and there’s nothing we can say or do to change that. We just have to finally accept it and stop expecting them to come around, while doing our best to kill those who are trying to kill us.”
To finish this excellent piece by Bosch Fawstin, visit his post at FrontPageMag here.
For a handy shareable, 4 page, color PDF version, prepared with Mr. Fawstin’s approval, please click here.
To view “IllustWriter” Bosch Fawstin’s art and commentary, please visit his website at Bosch Fawstin.
Posted by CD, September 2, 2013
July 6, 2013 (From CW who says: Send to Congress. Share, use, edit… If Egypt can do it, can’t we?)
I call upon the federal government and each elected representative to now, finally, recognize the Muslim Brotherhood as detrimental to human liberty and representative democracy and to remove its influence from our shores. Whether in Egypt or in America, the Muslim Brotherhood (MB or Ikhwan), is ultimately a movement toward a global totalitarian sharia government and must be treated as such.
Confirmation of its objective is found in “The Muslim Brotherhood “Project””* (1982), wherein a 12-point strategy is outlined to “establish an Islamic government on earth.“ And in “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America”** (1991 Memorandum), wherein the MB defines its subversive agenda in the United States as:
“The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion (Islam) is made victorious over all other religions.”
I also call on the federal government to rescind dubious non-profit status for any entities and their leadership that are shown to have affiliation with the MB. In addition, where appropriate, to have these organizations and their leadership to register with the US government as foreign agents in accordance with the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) which requires anyone “acting as agents of foreign principals in a political or quasi-political capacity to make periodic public disclosure of their relationship with the foreign principal, as well as activities, receipts and disbursements in support of those activities” (see www.fara.gov).
The 1991 Memorandum lists 29 MB affiliated organizations including Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), Muslim Students’ Association (MSA), North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT), and Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP, linked as a predecessor to the Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR). Some of these organizations and/or their leadership have been exposed as supporters of jihad terror. In a gleeful bracketed note the MB author of the list of states “Imagine if they all march according to one plan!!!” (exclamation points in the original).
“The Muslim Brotherhood “Project”” lists as a key point: “To work with loyalty alongside Islamic groups and institutions in multiple areas to agree on common ground, in order to “cooperate on the points of agreement and set aside the points of disagreement”.” Just imagine if they really were to march according to one plan.
Further characterization of the MB is found in their creed: “Allah is our objective. Koran is our law. The prophet is our leader. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest aspiration.” How far can this be from al-Qaeda’s desires?
However, jihad in the way of Allah to establish Islam and sharia law does not just mean violent, armed insurrection; it also means achieving ideological objectives by means of infiltration into positions of influence within government or as advisors, costly lawsuits claiming discrimination, threats designed to squelch speech, demands for public accommodation, ownership or intimidation of the media and an ever increasing burden on public assistance systems. Foreign funding of university-level Middle Eastern programs comes with strings, with historical and ideological viewpoints that may lean toward indoctrination and not scholarly investigation. Funding, text book modifications and ideological pressure is now also being felt in elementary schools.
Sharia law must not be seen as just a religious law for Muslims, for it is a totalitarian theo-political construct under which Muslims and non-Muslims are oppressed. In addition to its hostility to the spirit of the Declaration of Independence and representative governance, at a minimum, sharia law conflicts with the US Constitution at Article IV Section 4 (republican form of government); 1st Amendment (freedom of speech, press, assembly and religion); 4th, 5th, 7th and 14th Amendments (personal security, due process); 8th Amendment (by allowing cruel and unusual punishments); and 10th Amendment (by prohibiting states’ rights). Ignorance and misplaced toleration of Islamic intolerance simply enables the advance of sharia and the retreat of open inquiry and the rule of Constitutional law.
One might reexamine the cogent letters Rep. Michele Bachmann and associates sent on June 13, 2012 to the Inspectors General of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice and the Department of State requesting a multi-department investigation into potential MB infiltration into the US government. In addition, Rep. Bachmann’s July 13, 2012 letter to Rep. Keith Ellison is particularly illuminating and includes 59 relevant footnotes to aid the reader in exploring the concerns raised. Rep. Bachmann found these letters to be both necessary and “beyond timely”—given what is going on in Egypt, this cannot be overstated.
That Islam has not yet achieved its objective or that it seems unachievable is immaterial, the global and domestic efforts to do so are in themselves destructive of our nation and free society. Egypt is demonstrating its resolve and its tilt toward freedom by once again containing the Ikhwan, the Muslim Brothers; I think it is time for us to consider the same.
The bombs of Boston, the massacre at Fort Hood and the infiltration of our nation are each dots of jihad to be connected and used in defense of self. It is moral and right that we do so; it is unconscionable that we have delayed self-defense for so long.
“The refusal of the Western elite class to protect their nations from jihadist infiltration is the biggest betrayal in history.” ~Serge Trifkovic
*”The Muslim Brotherhood “Project”” found here: http://www.investigativeproject.org/document/id/687
**”An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America” found here: http://www.investigativeproject.org/document/id/20
(Video courtesy of LSA at vimeo.)
STAGE 1: INFILTRATION
Muslims begin moving to non-Muslim countries in increasing numbers and the beginning of cultural conflicts are visible, though often subtle.
How many nations are suffering from Islamic infiltration? One? A handful? Nearly every nation? The Islamic ‘leadership” of the Muslim Brotherhood and others wish to dissolve each nation’s sovereignty and replace it with the global imposition of Islamic sharia law. Sharia law, based on the koran, sira and hadith, condemns liberty and forbids equality and is inconsistent with the laws of all Western nations. As the author and historian Serge Trifkovic states:
“The refusal of the Western elite class to protect their nations from jihadist infiltration is the biggest betrayal in history.”
STAGE 2: CONSOLIDATION OF POWER
Muslim immigrants and host country converts continue demands for accommodation in employment, education, social services, financing and courts.
Is there a pattern here? Theo van Gogh is murdered in the Netherlands for ‘insulting’ Islam; the Organization of the Islamic Conference demands ‘anti-blasphemy’ laws through the United Nations; France is set afire regularly by ‘youths’ (read Muslims); the rise of (dis-) honor killings…holocaust denial…anti-Semitism…deception re the tenets of Islam; hatred toward Christians and Jews and Hindus and Buddhists. The pattern for all to see is the rise of Islamic intolerance and the covert/cultural jihad to remake host societies into sharia-compliant worlds – to remove host sovereignty and replace it with Islamic sharia law. Sharia law that condemns earthly liberty and individual freedom, that forbids equality among faiths and between the sexes, that rejects the concept of nations outside the global house of Islam, that of dar al-Islam.
STAGE 3: OPEN WAR w/ LEADERSHIP & CULTURE
Open violence to impose Sharia law and associated cultural restrictions; rejection of host government, subjugation of other religions and customs.
The website www.thereligionofpeace.com keeps track of the number of violent jihad attacks as best it can. The site lists more than 14,000 attacks since September 2001. It is worth a visit. What is occurring, however, that is likely inestimable are events where muslims are bullied by other muslims for not being “muslim enough,” where non-Muslims are intimidated into doing or not doing what they desire, where remnant populations are in a death spiral simply for being non-muslim in a predominantly muslim area. Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists Animists and Atheists meet with death, property destruction or confiscation, forced conversion, rape, excessive taxation (the jizya), enslavement, riotous mobs and various other forms of islam (in-) justice at the hands of muslims in Sudan, Philippines, Kenya, Malaysia, India, etc. And let us not forget ‘death to Apostates’ the world over.
STAGE 4: Totalitarian ISLAMIC “THEOCRACY”
Islam becomes the only religious-political-judicial-cultural ideology.
The House of Islam (“peace”), dar al-Islam, includes those nations that have submitted to Islamic rule, to the soul crushing, liberty-condemning, discriminatory law of Sharia. The rest of the world in in the House of War, dar al-harb, because it does not submit to Sharia, and exists in a state of rebellion or war with the will of ‘Allah.’ No non-Muslim state or its citizens are “innocent,” and remain viable targets of war for not believing in ‘Allah.’ The Christian, Jewish, Coptic, Hindu and Zoroastrian peoples of world have suffered under subjugation for centuries. The Dhimmi-esque are forbidden to construct houses of worship or repair existing ones, economically crippled by the heavy jizya (tax), socially humiliated, legally discriminated against, criminally targeted and generally kept in a permanent state of weakness, fear and vulnerability by Islamic governments.
It should be noted that forced conversions (Egypt) and slavery (Sudan) are still reported. Homosexuals have been hung in the public square in Iran. Young girls are married to old men. Apostates are threatened with death. “Honor” killings are routine. Women are legally second-class citizens, though Muslim males insist they are “treated better” than in the West. These more obvious manifestations may distract from some less obvious ones such as the lack of intellectual inquiry in science, narrow scope of writing, all but non-existent art and music, sexual use and abuse of youth and women, and the disregard for personal fulfillment, joy and wonder. Look into the eyes of a recently married 12 year old girl to see the consequence of the moral deprivation spawned by Islam.
The 4 Stages of Islamic Conquest is also available in pdf format for easy sharing as part of “Liberty vs Sharia” (Click, save, share. Attribution appreciated.)
“Have you ever wondered why millions of Muslim men are dedicated to killing Americans? Or why so many are willing to blow themselves up to kill Israelis? Or why they are so committed to blowing up random people in Bali, London, Madrid, etc.?
Islamic supremacists are doing this all over the world, attacking Westerners and their own fellow Muslims alike. Why?
Because of a doctrine. A doctrine is a collection of ideas… If you were going to deliberately design a collection of ideas with the purpose of making it eventually dominate the world — one that would eventually out-compete every other religion, doctrine, or political system — you would be hard-pressed to do better than Islam.”
Includes: 26 Keys to the Theo-Political Doctrine of Islam:
Download and print PDF here
Original article at CitizenWarrior.com here
(Video courtesy of LibertyLSA at vimeo.)
The theo-political doctrine of Islam is defined by the koran (Allah) and sunnah (all things Mohammed) and implemented under “sacred” Islamic sharia law (see the ROTT*). Islam is as much a political ideology as a theological creed, concerning itself largely with the treatment of non-believers, rather than with good deeds and the salvation of believers. And its ‘good deeds’ often involve the maltreatment of non-believers. Islam, as a political manifesto, should be labeled a threat doctrine, its true believers a threat.
Islam makes the attainment of political objectives a religious duty. What is Islam striving to attain? Its ultimate imperial and supremacist aim is to replace or subjugate anything non-Islamic. First, a gentle invitation to Islam; accept and join the “ummah,” the global Islamic community. Second, a not so gentle offer to live in subjugation under sharia as a third-class non-Muslim, paying the jizya (non-Muslim tax) and feeling subdued, humiliated and weak. Or third, all manner of jihad upon you until you do the first, the second or die.
Nearly 1400 years of history are witness to Islam’s expansion and progress toward ‘sharia uber alles.’ Wherever Islam establishes itself, a state within a state develops and the existing form of government and unbelieving (kafir, infidel) culture is rejected. The ummah grows, first weakening the host culture by social pressure, political means or violence, then imposing sharia through intimidation or actual codification in law.
Sharia denies freedom of speech, religion, expression and action and rejects equality between men and women, thereby violating human rights. Sharia has no “Golden Rule” to treat individuals equally. Instead Sharia segregates people into classes: Muslims and non-Muslims. Muslims are supreme and non-Muslims are inferior, holding no equal rights under Islam. Muslim-Muslim relations are completely separate from Muslim-kafir relations, where deceit is sanctioned and mistreatment largely unpunished.
No matter the temperament of individual Muslims, the Islamic community as a whole, the ummah, drives the process of Islamization—situating Islam as a superior “special class”—in every country where Islam thrives. Islam and the sharia. Mosques teach it, Muslims demand it and all else falls before it. Across the globe intimidation, violence and political upheaval are associated with increasing Muslim populations.
The US is a representative democracy thoughtfully crafted by our founders, with the Declaration of Independence proclaiming that humans are created equal and have unalienable rights, and the US Constitution protecting these rights through law. Sharia is irreconcilably in conflict with our founding principles and law—its objectives are indeed to overturn our law and replace it with their sharia. We cannot extend our welcome to Islam’s supremacism and intolerance for to do so is cultural suicide.
President Thomas Jefferson rejected the payment of tribute to Islamic Ottoman provinces and their pirates in 1801. We should similarly reject any monetary homage today or tolerate the growth of a threat doctrine or its body of believers within our borders. The Islamic ummah and its law, the sharia, are grave dangers to the United States of America and should be acknowledged as such and treated as such.
Liberty vs Sharia pdf
*Reliance of the Traveller: The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law at Amazon
In any threat situation fear exists. Fear of death and manner of death, of pain, of confrontation, of shouting bearded men from an alien culture. Fear exists and is useful. Fear of islam/sharia/jihad is not a phobia. The reaction is the key… cowardice, appeasement and submission are common responses, however courage, action, insight, leadership are also possible responses to fear.
The other part of response is our lack of belief in ourselves, perhaps even an understanding of why we are not Afghanistan or Somalia or Zimbabwe or North Korea. PC – not speaking in facts, truths, data, history, nor asking difficult questions – is disarming us mentally and physically.
Is PC about not offending someone else, or not believing in yourself? Are we as a society so hollow, so empty? As Evan Sayet put it, for liberals “A moral thought is an act of bigotry.” Is a moral assessment of evil bigotry? Can I not say that rape, murder and paedophilia are bad and wrong? That totalitarian government and intrusive, oppressive, discriminatory overlords are bad for humanity? That islam is not just different, but WRONG. Wrong on liberty, wrong on equality before the law, wrong on nuturing childhood development, wrong in its restriction of art, music, human expression? Are my thoughts a crime against humanity? Or an assessment of a theo-political doctrine that is the antithesis of Western Culture and the American Constitution that I cherish?