4 Stages of Islamic Conquest:

STAGE 3: OPEN WAR on LEADERSHIP & CULTURE   

Open violence to impose Sharia law and associated cultural restrictions; rejection of host government, subjugation of other religions and customs.

• Intentional efforts to undermine the host government & culture.
• Acts of barbarity to intimidate citizens and foster fear and submission.
• Open and covert efforts to cause economic collapse of the society.
• All opposition is challenged and either eradicated or silenced.
• Mass execution of non-Muslims.
• Widespread ethnic cleansing by Islamic militias.
• Rejection and defiance of host society secular laws or culture.
• Murder of “moderate” Muslim intellectuals who don’t support Islamization.
• Destruction of churches, synagogues and other non-Muslim institutions.
• Women are restricted further in accordance with Sharia law.
• Large-scale destruction of population, assassinations, bombings.
• Toppling of government and usurpation of political power.
• Imposition of Sharia law

The website www.thereligionofpeace.com keeps track of the number of violent jihad attacks as best it can. The site lists more than 14,000 attacks since September 2001. It is worth a visit. What is occurring, however, that is likely inestimable are events where muslims are bullied by other muslims for not being “muslim enough,” where non-muslims are intimidated into doing or not doing what they desire, where remnant populations are in a death spiral simply for being non-muslim in a predominantly muslim area. Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists Animists and Atheists meet with death, property destruction or confiscation, forced conversion, rape, excessive taxation (the jizya), enslavement, riotous mobs and various other forms of islam (in-) justice at the hands of muslims in Sudan, Philippines, Kenay, Malaysia, India, etc.  And let us not forget ‘death to Apostates’ the world over.

STAGE 2:   CONSOLIDATION OF POWER

Muslim immigrants and host country converts continue demands for accommodation in employment, education, social services, financing and courts.

• Proselytizing increases; Establishment and Recruitment of Jihadi cells.
• Efforts to convert alienated segments of the population to Islam.
• Revisionist efforts to Islamize history.
• Efforts to destroy historic evidence that reveal true Islamism.
• Increased anti-western propaganda and psychological warfare.
• Efforts to recruit allies who share similar goals (communists, anarchists).
• Attempts to indoctrinate children to Islamist viewpoint.
• Increased efforts to intimidate, silence and eliminate non-Muslims.
• Efforts to introduce blasphemy and hate laws in order to silence critics.
• Continued focus on enlarging Muslim population by increasing Muslim births and immigration.
• Use of charities to recruit supporters and fund jihad.
• Covert efforts to bring about the destruction of host society from within.
• Development of Muslim political base in non-Muslim host society.
• Islamic Financial networks fund political growth, acquisition of land. 
• Highly visible assassination of critics aimed to intimidate opposition.
• Tolerance of non-Muslims diminishes.
• Greater demands to adopt strict Islamic conduct.
• Clandestine amassing of weapons and explosives in hidden locations.
• Overt disregard/rejection of non-Muslim society’s legal system, culture.
• Efforts to undermine and destroy power base of non-Muslim religions including and especially Jews and Christians.

Is there a pattern here? Theo van Gogh is murdered in the Netherlands for ‘insulting’ Islam; the Organization of the Islamic Conference demands ‘anti-blasphemy’ laws through the United Nations; France is set afire regularly by ‘youths’ (read muslims); the rise of (dis-) honor killings…holocaust denial…anti-semitism…deception re the tenets of Islam; hatred toward Christians and Jews and Hindus and Buddhists.  The pattern for all to see is the rise of islamic intolerance and the covert/cultural jihad to remake host societies into sharia-compliant worlds – to remove host sovereignty and replace it with islamic sharia law.  Sharia law that condemns earthly liberty and individual freedom, that forbids equality among faiths and between the sexes, that rejects the concept of nations outside the global house of Islam, that of dar al-Islam.

STAGE 1: INFILTRATION

• Muslims are moving to non-Muslim countries in increasing numbers and the beginning of cultural conflicts are visible, but often subtle.
• First migration wave to non-Muslim “host” country.
• Appeal for humanitarian tolerance from the host society.
• Attempts to portray Islam as a peaceful & Muslims as victims of misunderstanding and racism (even though Islam is not a ‘race’).
• High Muslim birth rate in host country increase Muslim population.
• Mosques used to spread Islam and dislike of host country & culture.
• Calls to criminalize “Islamophobia” as a hate crime.
• Threatened legal action for perceived discrimination.
• Offers of “interfaith dialogue” to indoctrinate non-Muslims.

How many nations are suffering from Islamic infiltration? One? A handful? Nearly every nation? The Islamic ‘leadership” of the Muslim Brotherhood and others wish to dissolve each nation’s sovereignty and replace it with the global imposition of Islamic sharia law. Sharia law, based on the koran, sira and hadith, condemns liberty and forbids equality and is inconsistent with the laws of all Western nations. As the author and historian Serge Trifkovic states:

 ”The refusal of the Western elite class to protect their nations from jihadist infiltration is the biggest betrayal in history.”

For all four stages see “Liberty v Sharia” at http://shariafree.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/liberty-vs-sharia-1109.pdf

Out of the Moral Quagmire

The dual threats of our time are Leftists following marxist-progressive totalitarianism and Jihadis following the tenets of Islam. What common thread might there be in our current inability to collectively recognize and challenge these threats?

Our society has been coaxed, pushed and deceived by our schools, media, and certain intellectuals to be nice, to be endlessly neutral and at an extreme to give credence beyond reason to the ‘other’ side, to be politically correct. We also may be asked to atone for some past error of thought or action. In order to become morally neutral and avoid conscious discrimination, we are asked to be totally indiscriminate; to avoid a value judgment we are asked to be valueless. We are asked to accept other ideas and cultures in the name of diversity and multiculturalism, however to do so may compromise our own beliefs, however firm or frail their condition.

I charge that those who choose (and ask the rest of us to choose) to be morally “neutral” are really choosing to be morally relative, a moral quagmire in which good could be considered bad, and bad could be considered good. And when you choose moral relativism and good equals bad, then you deny any basis for morality – for a standard of good and evil, better or worse or even good and less good. Everything is merely a point of view. Fellow travelers are encouraged to respond “Gosh, who am I to say what is right or wrong?”

The Left’s moral compass is fickle and feckless or non-existent; truth might in some instances be dismissed as inconvenient, strength as weakness, clarity as bigoted. Those who have no objective, measureable standards, who reject norms of behavior, who deny morals we usually call sociopaths, but now include Leftists. Sociopaths want no controls on themselves, leftist only want controls on others; there is but a subtle difference.

In Islam, Mohammed’s evil deeds and words are used as a standard of behavior, as a moral compass. Islam does not promote right and wrong, only that which is allowed and that which is forbidden. Islam’s standard is Mohammed whose allowed list includes misogyny, pedophilia, rape, theft, deception, enslavement, subjugation, terror, murder and genocide, and whose disallowed list includes befriending non-believers, innovation and mirth.

We as a nation and a culture must be able to embrace and defend our own core values, primarialy those rooted in Judeo-Christian traditions. We had better be willing to argue for intrinsic good and act on behalf of good or the Leftist and the Islamists will see to it that their points of view are victorious. This is an ideological battle, a trifecta of ideological battles and their associated core values and standards of measure, whether virtuous or unworthy. However, if we stoop to measure the mediocrity of the Left or the evil of Islam, we miss the opportunity to make the more comprehensive choice to reject their ideology, their view point in toto. Is there really any point to arguing the minutia of whether beating your wife a little or a lot is the ‘better’ choice?

Read: Applied Moral Relativism, DL Adams, Stop Islamizaiton of America http://sioanetwork.com/?p=556

View: How Modern Liberals Think, Evan Sayet, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c

Who Will You Trust?

There is but one Islam and when it comes to non-muslims, it is neither moderate nor peaceful, but hostile. Islam is built on the koran (words of allah) and the life of Mohammed (sira/biography) and traditions of Mohammed (hadith), as governed by sharia law. The sira and hadith are known as the way of the perfect man or ‘sunnah,’ an important concept in understanding muslim behavior. Sharia law adheres to the tenets of Islam and condemns freedom (of speech, religion, expression, association and inquiry), forbids equality (between men-women, muslims-others), and allows misogyny, pedophilia and killing of apostates. Islam offers non-muslims first an invitation to convert, then subjugation with heavy taxation, and finally jihad until you submit to Islam or die.

You must become your own advisor on all things Islam. As the government and media will not properly inform you, you must read and listen to sufficient history and current events to be able to critically evaluate media coverage, effectively question your elected representatives and identify politically correct but inaccurate statements. You will soon be capable of recognizing uneducated mis-information and practiced deception. For example, are bored youths on summer break causing a disturbance in France, or are muslim gangs rioting in the streets and burning cars to intimidate the French? If there is conflict in the news and no one mentions its cause, ask yourself if Islam is involved (as in Sudan, Kosovo, Kenya, Indonesia, Kashmir, France, or the United Kingdom).

Be aware of information sources – are you reading an apostate’s story, an imam’s talking points, a historian’s research. And if the author is university trained, consider the level of foreign funding to that university and how it might have affected its teachings. Read the koran and study the sunnah or meaningful commentaries on their content. (I suggest R. Spencer, W. Phares, W. Sultan, B. Gabriel, W. Shoebat, B. Ye’or, A. Bostom, I. Warraq and others.)

The questions and issues surrounding Islam are of grave concern for your life and liberty. Do not fall victim to wishful thinking, or the deadly trio of appeasement, accommodation and hopeful assimilation. It is time to challenge those who paint Islam and its history only with pretty colors or who spin current events to blame “western oppression” or poverty. Do not hold opinions you cannot justify about Islam. To do so invites disaster. Islam and sharia law are antithetical to Western liberties and our constitutionally protected rights. Who will you trust?

A Question of Worth

My father taught me that a person’s worth as an employee or consultant was based on how irreplaceable they were to whoever paid for their service. If no one could do what you do as well as you do it, you had worth and a dollar value was placed on that worth.

Doctors invest in their training, spend long hours at work, and continue their education year after year to stay abreast of technology and pharmaceuticals; they have worth. Marketers who understand your product and design marketing strategy to inform the audience and garner purchasers bring wealth to the manufacturer; they have worth.

Now come to the traditional media, who seem immune to the idea. In depth training? Ongoing education? Staying in touch with the world around us? We are presented with pretty faces who mouth words in 30 second sound bites, not knowing what questions to ask, not understanding the implications of the answers, leaving us cold and in the dark.

Without a deep repertoire of history to draw on, without a broad understanding of world events and their drivers, without the ability to contemplate the threads between events in time and space, of what value are they to the listener, the viewer, the reader? We know no more at the end of the news than at the beginning, perhaps less, as facts are muddled and implausible inferences drawn.

I charge the media with dereliction of duty, for not having the wherewithal to understand the news, unable to challenge those interviewed, unable to put into context a question, let alone an answer nor comment on its implications. This is above and beyond the rampant ideological pollution and political spin of the news.

Yet, we thirst for news and commentary, we must have it. So, where do we turn? You are here, you are on a thousand websites with tens of thousands of reporters and commentators.

You have information needs and limited time: you decide what is worthy.

Ft. Hood, Islam and the PC Altar

Dear FOX News Sunday (fns@foxnews.com),

While I applaud your discussing Islam in relation to the Ft. Hood murders, I respectfully submit that unless you have studied the doctrine of Islam – the Koran, Sira (biography of Mohammed) and Hadith (the traditions of Mohammed), and its “divine” Sharia law you are very much out of your element in discussing Islam or Muslim behavior. Someone on your staff must immerse themselves in a study of the tenets of Islam, as Islam embodies the greatest global and domestic threat to liberty, equality and peace.

A Muslim acting in accordance with Islamic tenets and Islamic ‘logic’ is sane within that mind set. Under Islam, non-Muslims are guilty of not acknowledging Allah and his prophet Mohammed, therefore all manner of discrimination, harm and murder are acceptable and no penalty is imposed for the killing of infidels.

A Muslim who strives in defense or support of Islam may engage, indeed is required to engage in or fund, armed or covert jihad. Islam offers infidels three options, first conversion – an invitation to Islam (Osama bin Laden did this in a letter to former President Bush), then subjugation under sharia (as the Copts are in Egypt today), or jihad war until you convert, accept subjugation or die (reference Sudan, etc).

Islam’s express desire is to bring the world, Muslim and non-Muslim, under sharia law. If Islam is weak for a period of time, the Islamic community will appear peaceful; however as it gains in numbers and strength the Islamic community will attempt to impose sharia. For examples see Islamic demands and actions in the United Kingdom, France, Kenya or Indonesia.

Sharia law condemns freedom, forbids equality, and denies traditional sovereignty; it is legitimate that we reject it. The call to sharia law in America is a call to overthrow the US Constitution. Jihad, whether state organized or by individuals must be recognized for what it is, the followers of Islam engaging in war to advance Islam and force the imposition of Islamic sharia law. Please educate yourselves, lest more be sacrificed at the altar of political correctness.

To liberty under the Constitution,

CD, US Citizen

References:

• Koran, Sira, Hadith
• www.politicalislam.com  Dr. Bill Warner, books, analysis, audio
• www.sioa.com  Stop Islamification of America, analysis
• www.jihadwatch.com  Robert Spencer, books, analysis, interviews
• www.walidphares.com  Dr. Walid Phares, books, analysis
• www.actforamerica.org  Brigitte Gabriel, national organization
• http://www.shoebat.com Walid Shoebat, apostate, former terrorist

Dr. Phil – Your Ignorance is Showing

Dr. Phil @ www.DrPhil.com,

I respectfully submit that unless you have studied the doctrine of islam – the koran, sira (biography of mohammed) and hadith (the traditions of mohammed), you are very much out of your element in discussing islam or muslim behavior.

A muslim acting in accordance with islamic tenets and islamic ‘logic’ is sane within that mind set. Non-muslims are believed to be guilty of not acknowledging allah and that mohammed is his prophet, therefore all manner of discrimination, harm and murder are acceptable.

Under islamic sharia law no penalty is imposed for the killing of infidels. A muslim who strives in defense or support of islam may engage, indeed is required to engage in or fund, armed or covert jihad. Islam offers infidels an invitation to islam – conversion, or subjugation under sharia, or jihad war until you convert, accept subjugation or die. Islam’s express goal is to bring the world, muslim and non-muslim, under sharia law.

Sharia law condemns freedom, forbids equality, and denies traditional sovereignty; it is legitimate that we reject it. The call to sharia is a call to overthrow the US Constitution.

To liberty under the Constitution,

Civilus Defendus, US Citizen

References:

• koran, sira, hadith (online)
• www.politicalislam.com  Dr. Bill Warner
• www.sioa.com  Stop Islamification of America
• www.jihadwatch.com  Robert Spencer
• www.walidphares.com  Dr. Walid Phares

PC Kills

I wrote this yesterday… before a muslim opened fire in Texas:

(Regarding islam) we must widen the breadth of awareness, increase the depth of our understanding of islam, and ensure that those in positions to effect change are brought into the fold of knowledge. Those with open eyes see daily the growing boldness of our foe and the disarray of those who should protect us.

This is not about muslims, it is about ISLAM and those that work to implement its grand scheme to replace or subjugate anything non-islamic – to see the entire world under sharia law. Since sharia CONDEMNS freedom and FORBIDS equality under the law and DENIES traditional sovereignty, it is right that we REJECT both the ideology and those that attempt to impose it.

We owe our liberty to our ancestors; we owe our decedents no less. It is our right, it is our duty, it is our obligation to protect and defend the great Nations, Constitutions and Pacts of LIBERTY.

And today from the sage Hugh Fitzgerald we have:

“…The Pentagon, the American military, the Army, those who run Fort Hood, are guilty, in their refusal to recognize the effect of Islam on the minds of men, in their wilfull ignorance of what is contained in Qur’an, Hadith, and Sira, in their continual pretend-belief that only the obvious “extremists” are a danger to non-Muslims, are guilty of criminal negligence.

And the government of this country, and the governments of other non-Muslim countries who refuse to take Islam seriously, refuse to halt all Muslim immigration and work to diminish the number of Muslims present in our imperilled non-Muslim societies and states, are guilty of the same criminal negligence. …” (See complete comment at Jihad Watch - http://www.jihadwatch.org/2009/11/fort-hood-jihad-shooter-was-disciplined-for-islamic-proselytizing.html )

Accommodation, appeasement and hopeful integration is physical and cultural suicide. Armed jihad kills people and destroys things. Cultural jihad kills our institutions and destroys our ability for self-defense.  Every elected official, police officer and school superintendent should know that the Muslim Brotherhood has declared their ‘work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.’ The time to act is now, we cannot wait.

“The refusal of the Western elite class to protect their nations from jihadist infiltration is the biggest betrayal in history.” Serge Trifkovic

 

The Language of Islam

In an online discussion of the threat from islam, someone I call friend wrote something we could all benefit from considering. Bosch Fawstin (author, artist, patriot; http://fawstin.blogspot.com) emphasizes the importance of using precise language:

“I never add anything to the enemy’s lexicon, unless it’s for mockery. There is no such thing as ‘Islamonazism,’ it’s a Western concocted term, made up by those who want to avoid saying Islam, for whatever reason, and thus avoiding the root cause of what we face. Most of those who call themselves Muslims would not be identified as such by Islam. They are Muslims in the way politicians are honest. They ignore Islam the way most other religionists ignore their own religion. In this war, we are facing Islam through its most devout followers, not its deviants. In objective reality, Osama bin Laden is an evil man, but according to Islam, he is a Muslim idealist, modeling himself after Mohammed and following Islam’s orders. He is a Muslim practicing Islam, not an ‘Islamist’ practicing ‘Islamism’, but Islam as such. No one who uses terms other than Islam has ever made a clear distinction between Islam and any other alleged deviant form of it because they cannot. Islam is radical, it is totalitarian, it is political, but adding the word ‘radical’, ‘totalitarian’ & ‘political’ before Islam, gives Islam as such a pass, and why the hell should it ever be given one, after all the horrors in its wake.

Can you imagine hearing someone say ‘Radical Communism’ or ‘Radical Nazism’? I can’t.

And what further grates me is when there are a few Westerners at a panel about the enemy’s ideology, and each has a different way of naming it, with the words, “Well, I call it ’such and such.” Saying anything other than Islam when speaking of the enemy’s ideology gives Islam a legitimacy it has never deserved, and that to me is the danger in this Westernized terminology of all things Islam. Allah’s words in the Koran, “Kill the Infidels wherever you find them,” as well as “strike at their necks” represent normative Islam, not any deviant form of it. If non-terrorist Muslims don’t like being told or reminded about these brutal truths about their religion, too bad, just think of those non-Muslims who perished in Islam’s name, which should set your mind straight on who really should be getting the consideration here. Our protecting Islam from its true meaning, for ourselves and for Muslims, will only put off the inevitable ideological war against Islam that’s coming. Most human beings aren’t killers and can’t be made to become ones, no matter what, and this is the case with most Muslims. So since they haven’t said or done anything against the evil being done in their religion’s name, they are irrelevant. The Nazis called themselves Nazis and followed Nazism and we called them Nazis and defeated Nazism. Today’s enemy calls themselves Muslims and they follow Islam. It’s not our job to come to the semantic rescue of Islam because most ‘Muslims’ are not terrorists. We must stop making a distinction that the enemy does not make, all in the name of a fake respect for Islam. It’s not our job to defend Islam, it’s our job to identify it for what it actually is and act accordingly. Here’s a link to a piece I did on this name game we’re playing in, which is to our detriment, and to the enemies benefit:

They Say, We Say:  http://fawstin.blogspot.com/2008/11/they-saywe-say.html

I add, using words other than Islam to describe Islam only helps Islam, and so hurts us.

[Re terms such as "Islamism,"] I’d simply refer to the same thing as Jihad, both hard and soft, as does the enemy. I’ve yet to hear the enemy use Western terms to describe themselves or their mission, outside of their hijacking the meaning of ‘peace’ as a means to further their war against us. Adding the term ‘Islamism’ subtracts from that historically consistent terminology.”

So, don’t be shy, use the language of  islam. CD

When We Face Islam

Whether we are aware of islam or not, whether we understand islam or not, whether we ‘engage’ islam or not, the outcome of the islam-West (islam-not islam) interaction will be conflict, murder and mayhem. The conflict is about whether there is liberty in the land or subjugation under islam (think about doing everything you do tomorrow in handcuffs and gagged). The murder will be of those who speak out to resist the islamization and to enlighten others about the threats (authors and commentators would be on someone’s list). The mayhem will ensue as both sides attempt to advance and/or defend their nations, their beliefs and their lives (you and I will shout for legislation, call for action and will take up arms if we feel unprotected, threatened and exposed).

This is no fad, this will not go away if unaddressed. Shielding ourselves, our families, our communities from these details will only accelerate the rate of advance and the time of reckoning. Fortify yourselves. Arm yourself with knowledge. Assess your values. Steel your heart and embrace your liberty.

When the Melting Pot Doesn’t Work

The American melting pot concept allows for all to come and generation after generation a winnowing out of less beneficial ideas and practices and a strengthening of those ideas that are beneficial to the nation, to the human spirit. Overall the society grows and shapes and is shaped by its people.

This works well only where liberty is honored. Liberty and justice for all are America’s foundation. The ‘melting pot’ works less well – or backwards – in totalitarian societies where generation after generation only the strong-arm tactics or the most supplicating and subservient practices endure. This is almost a definition of West and East psychology.

To reach for the lowest common denominator among the earth’s cultures takes us to a dark and undesirable place. Hell on earth you might say.

Today we see a totalitarian ideology come to tolerant and free societies. So, do we free men enter bondage, voluntary slavery to allah and to sharia or enter the involuntary slavery of dhimmitude or do slaves of allah abandon their chains? As we see over and over again, integration, mutual respect and peaceful coexistence has not worked when one side swears fidelity to islam.

Dear DHS…is this Sedition?

July 17, 2009 DHS Tip Line (e-mail at https://tips.fbi.gov/ )

Dear DHS,

I am concerned that the meeting and the group described below are promoting the replacement of the US Constitution with Islamic Sharia Law. Sharia condemns liberty and forbids equality and conflicts with the US Constitution. We cannot have two sets of law in the US and sharia must never be adopted anywhere in the US. I would like to know if DHS considers those supporting sharia AND advocating for the overthrow of the US government and/or implementing sharia in the US to be inciting insurrection or conspiring sedition. Please investigate this. This is not a time for ‘political correctness,’ this is a time to ensure US residents and visitors are not plotting violent and non-violent actions aimed at disrupting our government, culture and institutions, and replacing our Constitution.

Thank you

Pro-Terror to Meet in Chicago Suburb, IPT News, July 10, 2009

Hizb ut-Tahrir, an international movement seeking to re-establish an international Islamic state – or Caliphate – and to indoctrinate Muslims into supporting jihad, wants to step up its recruitment efforts in the United States . On July 19, the group, whose alumni include 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and suicide bombers, will hold a conference entitled “The Fall of Capitalism and the Rise of Islam” in the Grand Ballroom of the Hilton Hotel in Oak Lawn , Ill , a Chicago suburb. (more)

PETITION UPDATE: Citizens’ Declaration & Plea

As of June 24, 2009, 187 Signatures: 32 States and 12 Countries: USA, Germany, South Africa, Spain, Portugal, Canada, UK, Australia, Romania, Thailand, France, Brazil.

Typical Comments:

• “The sedition laws of the Unites States make should make this petition unnecessary. We are using it to remind our elected Government of it’s responsibility.”
• “ Sharia law is unjust and not compliant with basic human rights.”
• “It’s amazing how the ‘caring’ and ‘tolerant’ Left-wing supports the extremely intolerant, Right-Wing Islamic Fundamentalists. . Is that the kind of world we want for our great-grand childrens’ great-grand children? A Taliban Planet? I bet not. Muslims are the biggest victims of Islam. We are NOT against Muslims, we are against Islamic Fundamentalism.”

 The whole humanity, Muslims themselves before anyone else, need be liberated from Islam. Just look and Somalia, Sudan and Afghanistan to know what Islam has in store for us…

Petition & Comments going to Congress during September 2009.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/citizens-declaration-of-threat-plea-for-relief

Excerpts from Dr. Wafa Sultan

Re President Obama’s Cairo speech:

“…The president pandered to Muslims: praised their accomplishments, commiserated with their grievances, and apologized for injustices done to them by centuries of colonialism — without once mentioning the history of rampant and violent Arab colonialism. He avoided any mention of Jihadi tenets, or of the Islamic political ideology of supremacy over non Muslims — principles embedded in Sharia law. These are taught and sanctioned openly by Al-Azhar, the university that hosted him, the foremost center of Sharia studies. Obama underscored the supposed American mistreatment of terrorists and apologized for torture in Guantanamo, forgetting that Islamic regimes are brutal to their own people. The president also repudiated significant U.S. contributions in both the lives of its soldiers and humanitarian aid to Muslims across the globe made throughout history — despite Muslim attacks against America and Americans. In short, parts of his speech sounded like a new Pan-Arab messiah come to usher the Arab world back into its rightful world dominion…

The president failed to join freedom-loving individuals, liberated Arabs like myself. He failed to lead the Muslim world into modernization and vital reform…”

from: http://www.hudsonny.org/2009/06/who-should-we-believe.php

I am Sovereign

I am sovereign. I have my set of beliefs and values, my actions are based on these. Honor, integrity, responsibility, optimism, lust for liberty, respect for life, truth, goodness, history, science, wonder, inquisitiveness, and trust in fellow citizens. I present this face and substance to the world at large. You can take or leave me, as you choose. I will not bow or kneel before you. I will not change my colors, my values, by beliefs for you. We can live amicably, unless you choose to fight me. And then I shall fight back, not to a stand off, but to victory, to make you incapable of taking what I have or forcing me to accept your values.

This goes for me as an individual. This should go for every sovereign nation willing to live peaceably in a world of nations.

Rogue states and thugocracies are due no respect.

Not to Worry…

…The goal [of Islamic Fundamentalism] is to intimidate non-Muslims by fear and threats, in order to re-establish a utopian theocratic world order in which Islam and Muslims are dominant and all non-Muslims are subservient.

Walid Shoebat, ex-causer of man-made disaster

I Discriminate Daily

I discriminate daily as any breathing, sentient being should: I discern, distinguish, delineate, describe, differentiate and decide without interruption.

To not use one’s faculties to evaluate between two or more options, to measure progress, to compare ideas, to contrast approaches, to recognize strengths and weaknesses, to sense current conditions, to judge the better choice. To voluntarily relinquish one’s ability to discriminate is foolhardy and unworthy of Homo sapiens sapiens.

Cultural Values Have Meaning

Our values, those of the predominantely Judeo-Christian West, have developed for more than 2,000 years and lead us to the liberty, equality and secular constitutional republic we enjoy today.  Islam has not developed. It started and ended in the few years of Mohammed and so it rests on those “values” of submission, inequality and totalitarian theocracy. Where the highest act is to submit, bow down, subjugate your brain, will, intellect and curiosity before Allah (and of course behave like the “perfect” man, Mohammed). Where the the believer is eternally set against the non-believer; where men are masters of women. And where the resultant totalitarian government by Sharia Law controls every aspect of life, action, thought.

Our values systems are not compatible, not blendable and have so little in common as to be a useless exercise to attempt the so called multi-cultural bliss. Separation is all there can be for now. However, we are in a battle at this point and there can be no semblance of peace (and as ordered a separation as possible) without some form of victory. It will be for Islam itself to transform itself, eat itself, die, or be converted to something other than what it is.

September 2009: Sharia-Free America

 

The Citizens’ Declaration is going to Congress & the Media.

Call talk radio & write Congress: ask about Islam in America.

Islamic Sharia condemns freedom and forbids equality…

WHAT is it doing here? . 

Islam is Not Just a Religion

Islam is not just a religion; it is also a political ideology as defined by the quran, and sunna as implemented by sharia law. Throughout its 1400 year history, Islam has through violence, intimidation, demographics or covert means subjugated peoples from Spain to Asia.

What Allah, Mohammed and Islamic leaders say to the Believer about their salvation is religious.

What Allah, Mohammed and Islamic leaders say to the Believer about how to treat Non-Believers is pure politics. And when this politics includes harm, misogyny, rape, enslavement, murder and utter subjugation, it should matter to all freedom-loving people across the globe.

Islamic leaders can be heard repeatedly calling to subjugate the West to Islam. This modern insurrection can be seen in demands for deferential treatment of Islam, including insistence on religious accommodations, judicial separateness, and general cultural and educational non-integration. The Islamic community as a whole drives the promotion of sharia law and the rejection of non-Islamic traditions.

Sharia is supremacist in nature, discriminatory in practice and rejects our constitutionally protected freedoms of religion, speech and assembly, thereby violating human rights. Islam is incompatible with our values and sensibilities of freedom, equality and secularism. This is not about Muslims, but Political Islam.

Citizens’ Declaration of Threat & Plea for Relief

We citizens of the United States of America, in order to preserve for posterity the foundation of liberty bestowed upon us by our founding fathers through our Constitution, do recognize the United States to be under grave threat of invasion, domestic violence and insurrection from elements within Islam. We respectfully declare the causes which lead to this belief and register our plea for relief.

We declare:
Islam is both theological and political in nature, as revealed in generally accepted renditions of the Quran, Sira, Hadith and Islamic law known as Sharia, whose expressed ambition is to bring the world into a state of submission to ‘Allah’ and divine (Sharia) law;

Core tenets of Islam are irreconcilably in conflict with the United States Constitution, identified in part as infringements upon freedom of religion and expression, lack of equality among people and between the sexes, and sanctioned deception in dealing with non-Muslims; these precepts constitute a breach of inalienable human rights;

Political Islam’s supremacism represents a duality of existence, placing Muslims superior to non-Muslims, and endorses behaviors that can debase, harm or kill non-Muslims;

History is replete with examples of the aggressive and violent expansion of Islam across Africa into Europe and across the Middle East into Europe and Asia, offering an invitation to Islam, subjugation under Islam with inferior class status, or jihad war;

Current events are filled with examples of the Islamic expansion and imperialism through violent and covert jihad, including Kosovo, India, Kashmir, Malaysia, Philippines, Sudan, Kenya, Israel, United Kingdom, France, Algeria, Morocco and others;

The attacks of September 11, 2001 upon the United States, its financial institutions, its people and traditions were claimed by people as jihad in defense of Islam, to spread Islam and to subjugate, obliterate, or otherwise defeat the United States;

Sharia finance has been shown to fund jihad against the United States and the West;

Many followers of Islam through words and deeds encourage insurrection and incite violence toward United States to subjugate it and replace the Constitution with Islamic rule; and

Many more silently endorse or use intimidation to support armed or covert jihad, thereby providing aid and comfort to our avowed enemies during these times of domestic and international strife.

Now Therefore We the People …
…appeal to the President, Congress, and Supreme Court for relief from these dangers and to defend the people of the United States, our traditions and legal underpinnings from threats posed by political Islam, its leaders, its followers, or any other aligned force. We state that any nation so threatened from within or without has the responsibility, obligation and right to defend itself and its people from aggressors. This declaration and plea are deemed legitimate demands upon our government; Article IV, Section 4, of the Constitution requires the United States to protect each state against threat of Invasion and domestic Violence. Continued accommodation, appeasement and hopeful assimilation constitute surrender to a totalitarian ideology. The duty rests upon this generation to defend this nation for ourselves and posterity. We cannot allow liberty borne of more than 2,000 years of civil development to be vanquished.

Plea for Relief:

1. That political Islam and Sharia law be officially recognized by the federal government as threats to the United States, the Constitution, and American culture and institutions.

2. That Title 18 USC “Chapter 115: Treason, Sedition and Subversive Activities,” including incarceration, deportation or execution, be fully utilized as duly appropriate for advancing Sharia law, advocating or acting to implement jihad or other acts detrimental to security.

3. That Department of State programs, policies, training and relationships be evaluated for their compatibility with national security, and amended accordingly.

4. That foreign aid to Islamic nations cease and aid to nations influenced by Islam be severely curtailed, except to resist jihad.

5. That participation in the United Nations be reassessed based on human rights, security and relevancy.

6. That the courts and law enforcement be trained to recognize Sharia law, Muslim Brotherhood activities and the manifestations of jihad; and that jihad crime statistics made available.

7. That immigration reforms immediately be implemented to include a suspension of immigration by Muslims for not less than 20 years, exclusive of apostates seeking asylum.

8. That all prospective immigrants be characterized for their compatibility with the United States Constitution and be required to pledge an oath of allegiance, with violators deported.

9. That visa applicants be rejected for seditious history, or intent or association with jihad and that any foreign visitors exhibiting seditious behavior be arrested and/or deported.

10. That no Sharia-compliant finance be adopted for any government financing; that any private financial institutions must fully disclose any Sharia-compliant activities.

11. That our borders be secured by means of physical barriers, patrols and military actions as necessary to repulse illegal entrants.

12. That the legacy of jihad be subject to critical analysis in public and military education.

13. That no foreign influence or advocacy be tolerated in public school textbooks or materials.

14. That no foreign ownership be allowed of any media that purports to provide news services.

15. That no public monies or services shall be dispensed to encourage social separation in courts, schools, hospitals or other public or private places.

16. That any mosque violating its religious standing be reclassified as political in nature and subject to tax laws and if deemed appropriate other civil and criminal laws.

17. That any mosque found to engage in political organizing, allow or encourage incitement to violence, subversion or jihad be closed for not less than 2 years, and permanently for a second such finding.

18. That no additional mosques be allowed until Islamic countries reciprocate in international relations, freedom of religion and houses of worship, and social equality.

We cannot accommodate hostile customs, tolerate unconstitutional behavior nor appease our adversaries without losing what it means to be American.

Civilus Defendus, 2009